Browse
Do Multiple Worship Styles Say “We’re Not Sure What Kind of Church We Are?”

Do Multiple Worship Styles Say “We’re Not Sure What Kind of Church We Are?”

Posted February 9, 2011 by Jerod Clark

Brian Kaufman wrote a great article this week for Shrink the Church talking about the things we do as churches to focus inwardly on ourselves instead of reaching out to our communities.  He listed five practices of an inwardly-focused church which you can read here.  But one of them stuck out to me.  Kaufman wrote:

An Inwardly-Focused Church Offers Multiple Styles of Worship

This one is difficult, so bear with me for a moment.  Is our God traditional or contemporary, emergent or conservative, Catholic or Lutheran?  In my opinion multiple worship styles communicate one thing very clearly, We are not sure what kind of church we are but we want to appeal to a broad audience.” My issue here is not with specific styles of worship, it is with specific styles of worship under one roof.

In my opinion multiple worship services/styles are confusing and further promote an Enlightenment-era philosophy in which our personal comfort and preference supersedes the reality of the Great Commission and cross of Christ.  If you’ve got the resources and vision to do multiple styles of worship perhaps the strategy needs to be rethought?  For example, perhaps a new style of worship could be saturated in a church plant located closer to the demographic which responds to that certain style?

There are a lot of very large and rapidly-growing churches that produce multiple worship services and would probably argue well against this point.  Admittedly, and to the frustration of my wife, I tend to over-simplify some things as black or white.

This is a bold stance that I can relate to very well.  I used to go to a church where there was an early service with traditional music and a late service that was more contemporary.  The problem was the church didn’t necessarily do either one of them all that well.  Resources were stretched.  Practice time was limited.  Our worship staff didn’t really like doing the traditional music but they felt like they had to in order to appease a certain group of people.  In the end, they couldn’t focus on what they could do best or which style best reflected the church’s DNA which was more modern.   

That said, this was a large church with a wide variety of people.  Shockingly to me, friends of mine preferred going to the traditional service instead of rocking out with me at the late service.  It showed there was a difference in what the congregation liked.  Would the traditional folks, who were in the minority, quit coming to the church if all the services were contemporary?  It's hard to say.  Some might.  I'd guess most would still come because of the church's dedication to reaching out to the community.  They'd get over the switch to all contemporary music knowing the church was having a greater impact.  Changing to better reach the community is a part of this church's history.

Either way, I can argue for or against Kaufmann’s point.  Although I applaud him for taking the bold stance because for some churches I think this is a real problem.

What about you?  Do multiple worship styles say, “We’re not sure what kind of church we are?”

Filed under: Branding, Visitor's Perspective, Communications, Worship Service

About the Author

Jerod Clark

Jerod joined ReFrame Media in 2007 and built Church Juice from scratch. He poured all his passion for branding, marketing, and messaging into the ministry, publishing e-books, blog posts, and speaking at conferences to help churches energize their communications. He also served as ReFrame’s in-house graphic designer. Before beginning his work at Church Juice, Jerod was a local TV news reporter. In 2016, Jerod stepped away from the ministry to pursue interests in marketing and communications on new horizons.

Don't miss a post

Join our email list

Comments (2)

  • MichelleCastle
    2:41 PM
    Thu, Feb 10, 2011

    No, multiple worship styles don’t say “we’re not sure what kind of church we are” and they are not a sign of an inwardly-focused church.

    He wrote, “Is our God traditional or contemporary, emergent or conservative, Catholic or Lutheran?” I would answer that our God is all of those. He is the same yesterday and today, so he is traditional and contemporary. My belief is that our God is great and worthy to be praised precisely because all peoples can find in him the greatest expression of their culture’s ideals. We don’t worship a tribal god who people outside our culture can’t find any value in. We don’t worship a god who can only be valued when we speak in Latin or perform African worship rituals that would cause large parts of the world to be excluded from knowing Him.  Multiple styles of worship reflect the grandness of our God; it doesn’t say we don’t know who He is. It says He’s worthy.

    Churches that want to “appeal to a broad audience” are not inwardly-focused. Paul wrote that we should become all things to all men, so that some might be saved. An outwardly-focused church does what it can to make it clear that the Gospel is attractive, and a style of music people respond to can be a factor in that.

    “In my opinion multiple worship services/styles are confusing and further promote an Enlightenment-era philosophy in which our personal comfort and preference supersedes the reality of the Great Commission and cross of Christ.  If you’ve got the resources and vision to do multiple styles of worship perhaps the strategy needs to be rethought?  For example, perhaps a new style of worship could be saturated in a church plant located closer to the demographic which responds to that certain style?”

    This seems contradictory to me. He writes that multiple worship styles promote the idea that our personal preferences supersedes the Gospel, but recommends that we base the worship style of a church plant on what we believe the demographic will prefer. In contrast, I think multiple worship styles can teach that it’s God’s worth that supersedes, not musical preference. It’s all in the way the leadership presents the multiple styles.

    “Shockingly to me, friends of mine preferred going to the traditional service instead of rocking out with me at the late service.”
    This shows a flaw in reasoning people make often. People don’t necessarily want to worship to rocking music, nor is it the only style of music that appeals to young people. Changing to better meet the needs of a community is great, but don’t fall into the trap of thinking your community only likes one type of music. There is diversity in every community, and just like it’s a tragedy when a church can’t reflect a diverse racial neighborhood, it’s not a good thing when their insistence of using only one style of music excludes the diversity inherent in their community.

  • Bradley
    6:35 PM
    Mon, Feb 14, 2011

    I have to agree Jerod.  As music pastor, I have struggled before with the possibility of adding a second service to appease a particular group in the church who was not happy with a blended service or more contemporary service.  In the end the decision between pastor and myself is that first, you’re splitting the church.  What happens is you have two groups who in essence say, I can not or will not worship with that group in that style of worship.  The next question is what does that portray to newcomers and visitors?  Instead of being outwardly or inwardly focused we decided to be upwardly focused asking God, “What would please you?”.  In the end, we’ve ended up with a wonderful blended service using contemporary arrangements of old hymns with some newer stuff as well that seems to be pleasing to most worshippers.  As such we do not have to worry about stretching our resources and can focus outwardly to the city.

Leave a Comment

Share your thoughts about this blog post with us.
All fields are required.

Recent Posts

Why Your Church Needs a Brand
Why Your Church Needs a Brand
0

Posted November 6, 2018 by Robert Carnes

Branding can feel like a bad thing within the church. In reality, that’s not the case. It’s not in the Bible so why do we need to talk about it? How we represent ourselves can impact who we’re able to build relationships with.
What is Branding?
What is Branding?
0

Posted November 1, 2018 by Bryan Haley

Whether you realize it or not, your church has a brand. What is a brand? What can you do to help your church’s brand?
After the Event
After the Event
0

Posted October 30, 2018 by Joe Gallant

You've followed all of Church Juice's tips for planning a church event. Promotion has begun, logistics have all been organized. There's a real buzz around the church and community, and people are excited about attending. So what now? How do you plan for after the event has taken place?
Maximizing Christmas Eve
Maximizing Christmas Eve
2

Posted October 18, 2018 by Ernesto Alaniz

Many churches have learned the impact of a special holiday gathering. Christmas Eve may be the easiest invite to our unsaved friends all year. Here’s some things to consider as you plan your gathering.
The Best Form of Marketing
The Best Form of Marketing
0

Posted October 16, 2018 by Bryan Haley

There are a lot of ways you could be advertising for your next outreach event. Here’s the best way you can communicate what’s happening at your church.
Sharing Church Photos Online
Sharing Church Photos Online
6

Posted October 11, 2018 by Bryan Haley

Sharing images and video of events is a great way to share stories and celebrate what's happening in your church. But that also means we need to talk about privacy, expectations, and good practices.
The Real Mission of Big Events
The Real Mission of Big Events
0

Posted October 9, 2018 by Jeanette Yates

We want our church to be missional. What if our big attractional church event is actually vital to the mission?
How to Use Social Media for Outreach Events
How to Use Social Media for Outreach Events
1

Posted October 4, 2018 by Jordan Gorveatte

Social media and the internet mean there are ways to draw people into your church’s events that are relatively easy and extremely cost-effective. As we discuss how to use social media to draw people in for these events, we’ll identify three steps: inform, compel, and invite.
Planning Your Fall Outreach: Think Follow-Up First
Planning Your Fall Outreach: Think Follow-Up First
0

Posted October 2, 2018 by Bryan Haley

We put a lot of time into our fall outreach events, bringing new families to our church. But what happens after the event is over is just as important as the lead-up to the event.
Where Do You Struggle?
Where Do You Struggle?
0

Posted October 1, 2018 by Bryan Haley

To start out the last quarter of 2018, we're asking you 5 quick questions.