Browse
Uber Logo Change: What Churches Can Learn

Uber Logo Change: What Churches Can Learn

Posted February 10, 2016 by Jerod Clark

When major companies with loyal fans undergo significant logo changes, there is often a crowd forming ready to hurl negative reactions. Car-sharing service Uber finds itself on the receiving end of the critical dismay after recently launching a new brand identity that was quickly dissed by artists and Uber drivers alike.

As the new look launched, Wired published a behind the scenes look at the two and a half year process that ended with the company’s lead designer leaving (even though he says it was because the launch went well).

While there are plenty of lessons to learn from Uber in what not to do, there were some surprisingly good aspects as well. Rebranding is a common struggle for churches, too. Here are some of the key lessons from Uber’s experience that will help you handle the process better.

 

First, the bad.

Closed, in-house process, led by a non-designer. Uber is Travis Kalanick’s obsession. As founder and CEO, he was the only person he trusted to lead the design process. Yet he’s an engineer and not a designer. Outside branding firms weren’t meeting the company’s expectations, so Kalanick assembled a small internal team, which did include graphic designers, that met periodically for two and a half years behind closed doors in the “war room.”

There is nothing inherently wrong with doing brand redesigns in house with a select group of people. After all, design by committee, where too many people with the wrong skills are at the table, rarely works. But a closed process like this can lead to a group think mentality where perspective is lost, procedures don’t allow for true creativity and processes are drawn out too long.

Uber lost focus on the end user. I’ve seen the process mentioned above first hand in a church I previously attended (and I bet you’ve experienced it, too). The lead pastor had a small group working on a new logo where there wasn’t respect for the opinions of marketing folks in the room. The church ended up with a logo the pastor wanted, but it felt dated. It didn’t represent the church’s culture and worst of all, it didn’t share the right message with the community the church wanted to reach.

By many accounts, the voice of the customer was lost in the Uber process as well, especially in the first 18 months of the process. The managers involved in the redesign kept fine tuning the new branding into something they liked with symbolism they believed represented users. It turns out, the public doesn’t see it. Your personal design aesthetics are not necessarily those of the people you serve. Always keep your end-user in mind and test your concept with a select group of them. I guarantee you’ll find ways your design isn’t communicating the way you expected.

 

Now, the good.

Uber found a theme for why they designed what they did. Many times a rebranding process starts with the notion that it’s time for a new logo without much thought on what comes next. While Uber execs had a bit of the same blindness, they did eventually land on a concept for guiding what the new design should be. They developed a concept of “bits” representing the technical side of Uber logistics and “atoms,” representing the people the company served.

While a bit abstract, the bits and atoms guidepost made it easier for the design team to say yes to the right ideas and no to others. It was a framework that lead to an app icon design with a textured background (atoms/technology) with a solid shape on top (bit/Uber user).

Uber localized their content. In the later stages of the project, when the group realized they shouldn’t be designing just for the CEO, the design team realized that’s tough for a global company to create one look to appeal to all of their diverse customers. Consequently, Uber created 65 different mood boards with specific colors and images that would be used in different parts of the world.

Churches have fragmented audiences as well. While it’s best practice to have a single church brand, there are various audiences where you will tweak your message. You’ll communicate differently to men and women, youth and adults or long time members and new guests.

Filed under: Branding, Logo, Communications, Leadership

About the Author

Jerod Clark

Jerod joined ReFrame Media in 2007 and built Church Juice from scratch. He poured all his passion for branding, marketing, and messaging into the ministry, publishing e-books, blog posts, and speaking at conferences to help churches energize their communications. He also served as ReFrame’s in-house graphic designer. Before beginning his work at Church Juice, Jerod was a local TV news reporter. In 2016, Jerod stepped away from the ministry to pursue interests in marketing and communications on new horizons.

Don't miss a post

Join our email list

Comments (0)

Leave a Comment

Share your thoughts about this blog post with us.
All fields are required.

Recent Posts

Choosing a Facebook Cover Photo
Choosing a Facebook Cover Photo
0

Posted February 18, 2019 by Bryan Haley

Your church's Facebook Page cover photo is prime real estate. It's the largest area you have to visually display something for your church. Here's how to choose the right Facebook cover photo.
Snappy Solutions
Snappy Solutions
1

Posted February 13, 2019 by Matthew Hooper

Snapchat is one of the many social communication options around. It’s unique feature of deleting posts means you needs to navigate this social channel in a completely different way.
The Best Time to Post on Facebook
The Best Time to Post on Facebook
0

Posted February 11, 2019 by Jordan Gorveatte

With algorithms and engagement constantly changing, what are the best times to post on Facebook? We break it down for you here.
Instagram and the Visual Web
Instagram and the Visual Web
0

Posted February 6, 2019 by Bryan Haley

Your church needs to think more visually. Instagram’s wild success and influence is continuing to move the web toward visual.
4 Things Churches Need to Stop Posting on Social Media
4 Things Churches Need to Stop Posting on Social Media
6

Posted February 4, 2019 by Robert Carnes

There’s plenty of articles talking about what the church could add to their social media channels. This article is the opposite of that—four things that churches should stop adding online.
The McDonald’s Method
The McDonald’s Method
1

Posted January 29, 2019 by Matthew Hooper

3 guys walk into a church. They all question what year they walked into. Should you update your building’s look? How should you go about a building update?
Good Websites Remove Barriers
Good Websites Remove Barriers
1

Posted January 22, 2019 by Bryan Haley

After moving to a new city, we started looking online for a new church, and it made me realize how many churches don’t prioritize their website. A poor website does nothing to help potential guests want to show up on Sunday. Here’s how a good website removed barriers.
2019 Design Trends Forecast
2019 Design Trends Forecast
2

Posted January 17, 2019 by Gage Hunt

What should your church be expecting out of graphic design trends this year? Here's our best guess.
15 of the Best Church Websites for 2019
15 of the Best Church Websites for 2019
0

Posted January 15, 2019 by Bryan Haley

We've spent dozens of hours searching the web to find the best church websites in North America. Here are 15 of the best church websites this year.
Go Live or Go Home: Streaming Strategy for Small Churches
Go Live or Go Home: Streaming Strategy for Small Churches
1

Posted December 27, 2018 by Matthew Hooper

Thanks to Youtube, Facebook Live, and the advent of affordable smartphones, anyone can get in on the online church game. Here are some questions to work through to set up a winning strategy with taking your church live.